Search
Close this search box.

Why you shouldn’t rely on EPIRB & PLB’s for lone worker protection

LinkedIn
Email
Print

There are 1000’s of EPIRB’s & PLB’s in the field being used to protect lone workers.

As a back up, or for recreational use… Sure.  Go ahead.  But for keeping staff safe on a daily basis, not so much.

We’re not big fans.

Largely due to the number of failures and serious delays we hear of constantly, from users who are moving to inReach.

Also, because we don’t really feel it fits the “effective works of communication” guideline in the HSWA.

We read everything we can get our hands on to ensure we’re keeping up with any potential advancements, and we come across a few independent comments and trials.

We’ve prepared an information paper from our research.

In our paper you will learn:

  • The difference between EPIRB’s PLB’s and 2 way satellite communicators.
  • Why you shouldn’t rely on EPIRB & PLB’s to protect your lone workers.
  • The difference between the Inmarsat satellite system and the iridium satellite network and which will give your lone workers the best level of protection in the field.

To download our info sheet, please enter your details below.

Not sure what you need?

Get your free copy of our buyers guide

“How to Evaluate Lone & Remote Worker Solutions”. Learn how to select the right devices, monitoring & get clarity on the best lone & remote worker solutions for your organisations needs.

Lone Worker risk assessment

Identifying an effective Lone Worker management solution can be daunting. Our Lone Worker Risk Assessment helps you cut through the noise. Get a better idea of your lone worker risks.

Lone Worker Safety Solutions Audit

Because we don’t know each other yet we have designed a quick lone worker safety audit. This lets us get to know you better and answer any questions you may have.